|
|
Vqaa Battleground State Profile: Indiana
The Supreme Court lent a sympathetic ear Wednesday to a victim of child pornography who wants the court to make it easier for victims to collect money from people convicted of downloading and viewing the pornographic images.The woman known as Amy was at the court, her legal team said, for arguments in which the justices underscored that she and other victims of child p stanley cup ornography suffer serious psychological harm whenever anyone looks at their images online.But the court seemed to struggle with determining how much restitution for counseling, lost income and legal fees any single defendant should be asked to pay.Sup. Ct. to weigh police searches of cellphonesHow Supreme Court justices are leaning in abortion clinic free-speech caseThe justices heard an appeal from Doyle Randall Paroline, who wa stanley cups uk s held liable by a federal appeals court for the nearly $3.4 million judgment associated with the ongoing Internet trade and viewing of images of Amy being raped by her uncle when she was 8 and 9 years old. Paroline had hundreds of images of children on his computer when he was arrested but only two were of Amy. He s guilty of the crime, but to sock him with all of her psychological costs and everything else bec stanley cup quencher ause he had two pictures of her. Congress couldn t have intended that, Justice Antonin Scalia said in an exchange with Amy s lawyer, Paul Cassell.Several other justices also said they were troubled by the apparent lack of a link between the Juio Judge overseeing Trump documents case sets Aug. 14 trial date, but date is likely to change
GETTY IMAGES/Mark Wilson Updated at 5 p.m. ET.Some Hous stanley thermoskannen e Democrats are reportedly calling for Rep. Charlie Rangel D-N.Y. to give up his powerful chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee in the wake of an admonishment from the House Ethics Committee, but House Speaker Nancy Pelosi today sidestepped questions about whether she also wants to see Rangel step down from his post.The ethics committee accused Rangel of accepting corporate money for trips to Caribbean conferences in violation of House rules, but it could not determine whether Rangel knew about the financing. The committee determined that Rangel s staff did know about the financing and said Rangel was responsible for learning the truth. Rangel is the subje stanley cup ct of another larger ethics investigation that is looking into his use of official stationary to fundraise for a college center in his name, as well as his late disclosure of previously unreported assets. At a press briefing today, Pelosi emphasized to reporters that the ethics committee said Rangel did not violate any rules of the House. That s an important statement that they made, she said. Obviously, they have other issues to deal with, Pelosi added, referring to the ongoing investigation into Rangel. I stanley italia hope that they will have other action soon, but they did not take action against him... We ll just see what happens next, what comes out of the ethics committee next. Other Democrats, however, think p |
|
发表于