|
Inwj Value Investors Should Check Out Cott Corporation for Hidden Cash Flows
You don t need tons of upfront investment or take a high risk to make $1 million. All you need is strict discipline to invest regularly and the patience to hold on to your investments for a long time. You will be surprised that even a small investment of $300/week stanley quencher in one of the top Canadian blue-chip stocks offering a modest annual return of 10% can help you reach the $1 million mark in 20 years.聽Take聽Fortis聽 TSX:FTS NYSE:FTS , for example. The utility giant s business remains immune to the economic cycles, and its shares are among the safest bet on the聽Toronto Stock Exchange. Fortis stanley cups generates almost all of its income from the regulated business that deli stanley cups uk vers predictable cash flows.聽On average, Fortis s annual total shareholder returns capital appreciation plus dividends for the past 20 years聽stands at 14%, implying that a $300/week investment in Fortis stock over the last 20 years would now be worth $1.7 million.聽聽So, if you are willing to stay committed to your investment of $30 Awdg Want to Bet on Oil s Recovery Avoid Suncor Energy Inc. and Imperial Oil Limited
There no shame in sticking with Canada blue-chip dividend stocks for growth and income.Investors are encouraged to choose large-cap stocks to avoid getting burn stanley thermobecher ed by penny stocks that promise instant riches but are lacking in substance. Although you won ;t double your money with a blue-chip overnight, you ;ll obtain above-average risk-adjusted returns over time.If you ;re willing to take on a bit more risk for more potential reward, it may be worthwhile to look at some of the TSX prized mid-cap plays. Such mid-caps tend to be mispriced to a higher degree by Mr. Market relativ stanley flask e to a name like BCE that every stanley cup quencher Canadian investor watches like a hawk.When it comes to Mr. Market pricing of mid-cap names, he typically overextends either to the upside or downside like a pendulum that struggles to remain in a static position. As such, the odds of locking in excess risk-adjusted returns are considerably higher for the names that fewer investors pay attention |
|