bgoo Senate approves stopgap funding measure to avoid government shutdown
Owmm With All Aboard, Amtrak Deal SealedWASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name.The justices ruled that the 71-year-old trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes free speech rights.The ruling is a victory for the Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but the case was closely watched for the impact it would have on the separate dispute involving the Washington football team.Complete NFL coverage at CBSSports stanley quencher Slants founder Simon Tam tried to trademark the band name in 2011, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the request on the grounds that it disparages Asians stanley cup . A federal appeals court in Washington later said the law barring offensive trademarks is unconstitutional. I was ridiculed as a kid for having slanted eyes,Tam told CBS News correspondent Jan Crawford in an interview broadcast before justices heard oral arguments in the case in January.Now I m saying it s something that I ca stanley cupe n be proud of, not something to be ashamed of. Asian-American rock band the Slants perform in a segment broadcast onCBS This Morningon Jan. 18, 2017. CBS The Redskins made similar arguments after the trademark office ruled in 2014 that the name offends American Indians and canceled the team s trademark.Djdl Michael Cohen search warrant documents mentioned Trump by name
A dozen retired generals and admirals said Tuesday they havedeep concernabout Alberto Gonzalesnomination as attorney general because of his role in crafting Bush administration policy on questioning terror suspects.The high-ranking officers include retired Army Gen. John M. Shalikashvili, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They made their views known in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will hold hearings on Gonzalesnomination later this week.They urged senators to question Gonzales aggressively about whether he now believes that torture may be used in some instances and whether anti-torture laws and treaties like the Geneva Conventions applystanley canada to anyone captured by U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. The full extent of Mr. Gonzalesrole in endorsing the use of torture remains unclear,retired Marine Corps Gen. Joseph Hoar said at a news conference organized by the group Human Rights First.The Justice Department in 2002 asserted that President Bush s wartime powers superseded those laws and treaties. Gonzales, while at the White House, also wrote a memo to President Bush on Jan. 25, 2002, arguing that the war on terrorismrenders obsolete Geneva s strict limitations on que stanley mug stioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provi stanley cup usa sions. Gonzales also received several memos on the subject, including one from then-Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee arguing that the president has the powe
页:
[1]